why choose us

Course: Clinical Prediction Models for Suspected Pediatric Foreign Body Aspiration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CME Credits: 1.00

Released: 2021-07-15

Key Points

Question What is the evidence for the use of clinical predictions models in diagnosing pediatric foreign body aspiration?
Findings This systematic review and meta-analysis identified models using predictors based on clinical history, physical examination, and radiographic findings. A meta-analysis of model performance suggests that there is a potential benefit of such decision-making tools, but is overall limited because of concerns of model overfitting, inconsistent reporting of performance, and lack of model validation.
Meaning Current prediction models for the diagnosing pediatric foreign body aspiration are at high risk of bias and are not recommended to guide clinical decision-making; thus, adherence to recognized guidelines for conducting and reporting modeling studies is recommended.

Abstract

Importance Although various clinical prediction models (CPMs) have been described for diagnosing pediatric foreign body aspiration (FBA), to our knowledge, there is still no consensus regarding indications for bronchoscopy, the criterion standard for identifying airway foreign bodies.
Objective To evaluate currently available CPMs for diagnosing FBA in children.
Data Sources Performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL database with citation searching of retrieved studies.
Study Selection Prediction model derivation and validation studies for diagnosing FBA in children were included. Exclusion criteria included adult studies; studies that included variables that were not available in routine clinical practice and outcomes for FBA were not separate or extractable.
Data Extraction and Synthesis We followed the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modeling Studies and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool framework. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.
Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the diagnosis of FBA as confirmed by bronchoscopy. Characteristics of CPMs and individual predictors were evaluated. The final model presentation with available measures of performance was provided by narrative synthesis. A meta-analysis of individual predictor variables and prediction models was performed.
Results After screening 4233 articles, 7 studies (0.2%; 1577 patients) were included in the final analysis. There were 6 model derivation studies and 1 validation study. Air trapping (odds ratio [OR], 8.3; 95% CI, 4.4-15.5), unilateral reduced air entry (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 3.5-6.5), witnessed choking (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.0-9.6), wheezing (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.2), and suspicious findings suggestive of FBA on radiography (OR, 18.5; 95% CI, 5.0-67.7) were the most commonly used predictor variables. Model performance varied, with discrimination scores (C statistic) ranging from 0.74 to 0.88. The pooled weighted C statistic score of all models was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80-0.92). All studies were deemed to be at high risk of bias, with overfitting of models and lack of validation as the most pertinent concerns.
Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that existing CPMs for FBA in children are at a high risk of bias and have not been adequately validated. No current models can be recommended to guide clinical decision-making. Future CPM studies that adhere to recognized standards for development and validation are required.


Educational Objective
To analyze and consolidate the literature on prediction models for the diagnosis of suspected foreign body aspiration.


View Full Course