why choose us

300×250 Ad Slot

Research Article: Ultrasound-assisted modified paramedian approach vs. traditional paramedian approach for spinal anesthesia in lower limb surgery: a single-center randomized controlled trial

Date Published: 2026-09-03

Abstract:
This randomized controlled trial aimed to determine whether an ultrasound-assisted modified paramedian approach could improve procedural outcomes compared with an ultrasound-assisted traditional paramedian approach for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb surgery. Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Operating rooms of Hebei Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, China. A total of 116 patients aged 18–90 years, with a body mass index of 18–30?kg/m 2 and ASA physical status I–III, scheduled for lower limb surgery requiring spinal anesthesia were enrolled. Patients with contraindications to spinal anesthesia, previous lumbar surgery, scoliosis, or pregnancy were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated random allocation sequence with concealed allocation to receive either ultrasound-assisted traditional paramedian spinal anesthesia (Group C, n =?58) or ultrasound-assisted modified paramedian spinal anesthesia (Group M, n =?58). Compared with Group C, Group M required fewer needle passes to achieve successful cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow [median [IQR]: 1 [1–2] vs. 2 [1–3], P =?0.006] and demonstrated a higher first-pass success rate [37/58 [63.79%] vs. 25/58 [43.10%], P =?0.026]. Group M also showed a shorter duration of the spinal procedure [12.5 [9.0–20.0] s vs. 15.0 [10.0–32.25] s, P =?0.028] and shorter total procedure time [76.5 [65.0–89.25] s vs. 82.0 [72.0–112.75] s, P =?0.031]. The distribution of patient satisfaction scores differed between groups, with a higher proportion of patients reporting being “very satisfied” in Group M (87.93% vs. 70.69%, P =?0.040). The incidence of procedure-related and postoperative adverse events was comparable between groups, and no serious complications occurred. The ultrasound-assisted modified paramedian approach was associated with fewer needle passes, improved first-pass success, and higher patient satisfaction ratings compared with the traditional paramedian approach, while without increasing short-term procedure-related adverse events. Further multicenter studies are warranted to determine whether these findings can be generalized to broader patient populations. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=203874 , identifier ChiCTR2300075567.

Introduction:
Spinal anesthesia is widely used for lower limb surgery because it provides effective analgesia, reliable sensory and motor blockade, and favorable perioperative outcomes. However, successful spinal anesthesia depends on accurate identification of the target intervertebral space and precise advancement of the spinal needle. Technical challenges remain common, particularly in patients with difficult spinal anatomy or when the procedure is performed by clinicians with limited experience. Multiple needle attempts or…

Read more

300×250 Ad Slot